Thoughts on the ocean, the environment, the universe and everything from nearly a mile high.

Panorama of The Grand Tetons From the top of Table Mountain, Wyoming © Alan Holyoak, 2011
Showing posts with label Madison County. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Madison County. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Politically disenfranchised in Idaho

Yesterday was the 2014 primary election.  For Madison County and Rexburg City, Idaho, this means that this was THE election that matters.  Now that the primaries are done the election in November is, for us, largely a formality where GOP candidates proceed to steamroll over the opposition, if any, in a tidal wave of "red" voting.  I'll get back to this later.

Idaho is politically inconsequential to most people in the United States.  Its population is so small and its political leaning is so overwhelmingly red that even Presidential hopefuls generally don't bother stopping by during their election years.  Republicans skip a visit to Idaho because they know they have the state all sewn up, and Democrats skip it because, well, it's largely a lost cause to them.

This brings us to yesterday's election and I'll use one race as the focal point of this posting:

Ron Nate vs. Doug Hancey (incumbent) for the State House of Representatives seat for Idaho District 34A.

Doug Hancey is a member of the GOP and a business man who knows what it takes to run a business, work with employees, etc., and who has a proven track record of working with house members on both sides of the aisle to get things done in the Idaho State Legislature.

Ron Nate is a also GOP, but with a stronger Tea Party flavor, who sells himself primarily as "the more conservative choice."  He is a professor of economics, and though he has been active in local political organizations he had never been elected to office.

During yesterday's primary election, as of midnight last night, Ron Nate earned 2710 votes to 2190 for Doug Hancey.  A story in today's Idaho Falls Post Register newspaper Doug Hancey said that he was disappointed, but that he was most likely hurt by low voter turn out.  Local reports also commented that voter turnout was low, and that they are at a loss about why this was so.

Why a low voter turnout?  This is no mystery.  A few years ago the Idaho state GOP voted to close all GOP primary elections.  Only registered GOP members are therefore allowed to vote in GOP primary races in Idaho.

I started thinking about this and I did some research.  District 34 includes Madison County and the northern rural part of Bonneville County, which does not include the cities of Idaho Falls or Ammon.  Rexburg is therefore the largest population center in this district.

According to the web site CensusViewer.com (http://censusviewer.com/city/ID/Rexburg), in 2010 Rexburg had a population of 25,484 with 20,289 over the age of 18 and therefore at least potentially eligible to vote.  Again, according to CensusViewer.com this is the breakdown of registered GOP and Dem voters in Rexburg in 2010:
  • Republican 4, 944 
  • Democrat 208
These numbers indicated that though this district votes overwhelmingly for GOP candidates, only about one quarter of eligible voters are registered as either Rep or Dem.

If we look at the voter turnout for the Nate v. Hancey GOP contest, we see 2,710 to 2,190 votes for a total of 4900 votes cast.  Is this a low turnout?  It appears to be when you compare this number to the total number of potentially eligible voters in the district (>20,000 of them), but it is probably an extremely high voter turnout when you consider the number of people would were ALLOWED to vote in yesterday's GOP primaries.  From the data above we know that about 1/4 of eligible voters in Rexburg are registered Republicans.  If we accept the assumption that about the same proportion of voters in the entire district are similarly registered we would probably see 6,000 to 7,500 registered GOP voters.  When we compare the number of votes cast in the Nate v. Hancey race to this number, the registered voter turnout is between 65% and 81%.  This is an incredibly high voter turnout.

What does this mean?  This means that the state GOP maneuvering to close its elections disenfranchises all but the faithful few in the state, and thus guarantees that at least in my part of the state that the few are deciding who the leaders will be for the many.

I wanted to vote, but it was illegal in Idaho for me to do so in the election that mattered to me - the GOP primary.  I am not a registered affiliate with any political party.  I'll say that again...it was illegal for me to vote.

As a political independent, formerly associated with the GOP, I am now disenfranchised and prohibited from voting in elections for my state and local political leadership.  Is this still America?  It doesn't feel like it.  At least it doesn't when less than 25% of the eligible voters are allowed to decide who sits in city, county, and state elected offices.

Friday, February 10, 2012

Kat is elected to the school board


Originally posted 5-17-2011

The polls are closed, and the votes have been tallied, and Kat was voted onto our local school board!  She asked me not to quote numbers, but both she and I were shocked and pleasantly surprised by the large turnout for an election with only one item on the ballot.

She won with a sound majority (actually about a 4:1 majority).  Thanks to everyone who helped with the campaign, and for your support!

On the way to the meeting when we would learn the results of the election Kat told me that in a way she feels badly that she won, because that means that someone else lost.  At the same time, she now has the confidence that she was elected with a strong majority and that the process ran its correct course.  We both believe that it is MUCH better that there were two names on the ballot that voters could choose between.

Here is Kat with one of her three (yep, just three) signs before we went to the meeting where we would learn the official results of the election:


Kat will do a fantastic job on the school board.   This position is an elected, but non-paying four-year position.  She is doing this because she feels strongly about education, and that she can act locally to make a difference, even in the shadow of State Supt. Tom Luna's "Students Come First" plan that, frankly, appears to have little if anything to do with putting students first.

Kat educates herself on the issues and ponders the potential results of different decisions. She will be a great representative on the board.

We are also extremely pleased that Dianne Eaton was elected in the other zone in which there was an election today.  She also won with a strong majority.  Kat and Dianne believe that they will be able to work with other board members to bring about progress and excellence in education in our school district.  Stay tuned for updates.

Congratualtions Kat!  We are proud of you!

Kat runs for the Madison County School Board


Originally posted 5-16-2011

It's time to get out the vote.  Tomorrow is one of the most important school board elections in recent history.  Two seats are being contested for the board in our school district.


The passage of State Supt. Tom Luna's "Students Come First" proposals by the state legislature pose extreme challenges to school districts across the state.  This is therefore the time to elect people who are passionate about finding ways to maintain the high quality of education for which our district is known, and who also have the capacity to make that happen.

Kathrine Holyoak is an absolutely top-notch candidate for the board.  She is running for the seat in Zone 1.

She has energy and passion for supporting quality education and educators.   She is well-informed about challenges facing the board that stem from the "Students Come First" legislation, and is ready to take on the work needed to build and maintain positive working relationships between the board and our district's educators.  Kathrine is a long-term advocate of public education, and she currently serves as a member of the Madison Education Foundation.

I am also very impressed by Dianne Eaton.  She is running for the seat in Zone 4.

She is also well-informed and brings important skills and abilities to the table.  She is also a strong candidate whose addition to the board would bring greate benefits to the board.

Pass the word!  Get out and vote.  It's never been more important to have a say about who will serve on our school board.  This is a critical time for education in Idaho.

Vote on May 17th between 8am and 8pm at your designated polling stations.